#790. Tash Sultana - Notion (#32, 2016)
81st of 2016
It's difficult to escape the comparisons to the John Butler Trio career arc. In 2016 Tash Sultana polls two songs, both fairly drawn out but catchy enough to defy the rules. The higher of the two becomes something of a signature song, and in the years that follow, we get numerous attempts to re-capture that hit in a more radio friendly way. We're talking about two songs where it takes roughly 2 minutes before any vocals appear on the record. It's something I suspect might be streaming poison to keep doing. I'm just imagining having "Notion" come on and someone could easily believe that it's a deep cut by Daughter, or more likely, jump out early because it just appears to be an instrumental for quite some time.
This song is not streaming poison at all, and I might go so far as to say it's the proto-typical Tash Sultana song. Helps that it's the title track to their first EP, all 6 tracks and 40 minutes of it. The only thing really holding it back is that it doesn't strike me as very ambitious once it gets going. The mood-setting intro is immediately the highlight and it just mostly stagnates until a guitar solo towards the end. Other than that, the main thing I remember is another instance of a very unsatisfying rhyme (gestures towards "Fire and the Flood" (#988)). Maybe there's a case I'm not thinking of where it works, but I look at notions/ocean rhyme on the chorus and it just feels unsatisfying. Like, you're just feeding us back the first word with a letter chopped off. Sheer stupid pedantry, but it's not a payoff to me.
#789. London Grammar - Baby It's You (#76, 2020)
74th of 2020
As time has gone by, one of the most peculiar aspects of popular music is the way that the albums chart has gone from a definitive popularity measure, to some sort of rout, to a vague combination of the two that's become even more confusing. If something is genuinely ruling the country, it'll get its flowers in perpetuity, but it'll be mixed in with two whole different breeds at the same time. In Australia and the UK, The Weeknd has possibly the biggest album of the decade, a hits package that's since gotten an expansion pack and charts in the top 10 pretty much every week. On raw numbers, it's justifying itself. It makes a decent showing on vinyl sales but in general, it's there because a lot of people are streaming The Weeknd's most popular songs every day. Ironically though, it's never gotten to #1, often because it's being blocked by albums that sell a lot of copies in one week (or even one day), and immediately drop off the face of the earth. These kinds of pseudo-popularity forms are always at battle, and the latter usually wins. I say they win because the shorthand for judging success continues to be peak positions. So much effort is expended to immortalise it, regardless of what happens in the long run.
With that in mind, the difference between a successful campaign and otherwise is massive, and with London Grammar we've seen it first-hand. You might not realise it, but their 3rd album "Californian Soil", which this song would eventually appear on is the band's only Australian #1. Their debut album spent 10 times longer in the chart but suffered from releasing alongside an album that might have a genuine case for being the most popular of the decade. What's more startling though is that London Grammar's next album, released last year, peaked at #79 in Australia. Sometimes this can be the result of a staggered campaign, for instance a late vinyl release (Here I am looking at the Lizzy McAlpine album last year), but it's not the case here. Something must have gone wrong in the promotion because London Grammar did about 1/5th the numbers of the previous album in pretty much all metrics. In saying all that, "Californian Soil" only debuted at #54 on the Spotify album chart despite being the #1 album in the country, dropping to #139 on the second week. You could argue that it's a more accurate showing without the mighty sales buffer. Still, in a world where many artists chug along with no new hits but a cozy #1 debut every few years, it's hard to fathom a harder, more random collapse.
For all that being said, it's not even the first big drop off that London Grammar had. They had everyone in the palm of their hand with their first album. Lots of songs I'll eventually be talking about. If that's not enough, they even complimented that with one of those songs becoming a very big crossover hit in Australia. They had every opportunity to continue being the next big thing and then just didn't. Their second album came out 4 years later and sold quite well, but for the Hottest 100, they barely slid in at #197, the kind of decline that suggests they were just done serving the general population. Luck was on their side in 2019 that they got to work with Flume and score a surprise new hit, and it seems that helped bring them enough favour to return to the Hottest 100 one last time with this song a year later.
Working with Flume may have influenced the sound on this song. Really it sounds a lot like a Vallis Alps throwback, but it's leaning into the band's electronic side in a way you don't usually see. In the context of the album, it sticks out a little bit, but the song never really goes overboard with it so it's not especially jarring. Listening to the album in full, there have always been a couple of songs I took away from it but it's hard to escape the feeling of stagnation, like outside of "Baby It's You", they're not sure where to take their sound and it's a lot of rehashing familiar ground.
One of the riskiest things you can do for your career is to take a very long time between albums. The moment people realise they can go on just fine without your music, is the moment that you've permanently shed a fanbase. For me it's worked well with London Grammar. Every new album cycle, I get re-introduced and get at least some morsel of a treat to enjoy. Hannah's vocal prowess is obviously the main event of the group and she has more than a few ways of making it catch you off guard. "Baby It's You" I don't think does it full justice. Another song that's permanently stuck in first and second gear and never really reaches the wow factor.
#788. SAFIA - Embracing Me (#23, 2015)
75th of 2015
Ignoring everything I just wrote, I don't feel the need to dive over the whole SAFIA history right here. As far as we're concerned, it's all contained in this time frame. A very exact one at that, from 2013 to 2016. The hits dried up very suddenly after that, but while they were making waves, they were very reliable. Maybe that was the SAFIA story all there anyway, we'll see.
Jumping back to 2015, SAFIA had not yet released an album, a very similar situation with their fellow Canberrans Peking Duk. A couple of Peking Duk & SAFIA collaborations will eventually appear on this list. Unlike them though, SAFIA did eventually release an album, and "Embracing Me" was the lead single from it, although I often forget that because it came out over a year earlier.
As someone who was pretty into them at the time, SAFIA had a way of turning every new single into an event around this time. Full support of the board in my eyes while having absolutely no idea what you were going to get. When songs are especially unique like that, I'm always going to remember hearing them the moment they were first unveiled to the listening public. Songs like "Born This Way" by Lady Gaga, or "The Last Man On Earth" by Wolf Alice. I can add "You Are The One" by SAFIA to that pile, and I can speak in high praise as it's the only SAFIA single from this era that didn't poll here. It's the song I most liken to "Embracing Me". Two songs that open up quietly, and let Ben show off his singing chops for about a minute before the drop finally comes in. It's not a total rehash, and on a good day, I might even say that "Embracing Me" pulls it off better. We've got a really solid 50 seconds going on...
I don't like the drop at all. It's a whole lot of bleeps and chopped vocals. It's not a disaster, I think they pulled off what they were trying to do without any metaphorical hiccups, but it's just not anything I want to hear. To make matters worse, it forms the skeleton of the track for most of the rest of it going forward. For such an exciting build up, we just get no real payoff. If you're willing to overlook the creepy lyrics, 'Like embracing me' just isn't a stunner of a hook. It sounds more desperate and cloying with how many times it's repeated.
#787. Haim - Want You Back (#47, 2017)
82nd of 2017
The Hottest 100 reinforces the idea that a lot of people jumped off the Haim ship after their debut album. This is the only song they've polled after that big year for them in 2013. Certainly if you were to compare them to, let's pick London Grammar and SAFIA as two random artists, the album by album stream decline they've got on Spotify is pretty respectable. Maybe it helps when you've gotten a piece of fortune in the stock of eventual Hottest 100 entrant Taylor Swift. As a band that never truly took control of the charts in their home country of America, the collaboration "no body, no crime" might be the only song a lot of people know from them.
I probably could have been one of those people who bought the debut album and then lost interest afterwards, but they have a habit of really catching me off guard sometimes. They're unlucky not to have another entry here collaborating with a certain Scottish DJ on a song I still have a lot of love for a decade later. They've got a small part with a cavalcade of very cool and random names on a "Hunger Games" soundtrack song I love, and then when I thought I'd heard everything from them, the song "3am" from their latest album just floors me. I don't think anyone ever asked for R&B Haim but it works so much better than you'd expect. It was their 7th most popular song in the past year on last.fm (even higher if you include the Thundercat remix probably), so it's not just me going rogue.
I don't have quite the same enthusiasm for "Want You Back". I can see why they went with it as a lead single but it feels almost a little too safe. I recall finding myself more drawn to the super catchy follow up single "Little of Your Love", but in general I feel like the middle section of the album gets into a pretty likeable groove. All the pieces are there for this one, it just doesn't stick the landing.
#786. The Weeknd - Blinding Lights (#71, 2019)
74th of 2019
Answering the question of what the biggest hit song of all time is, is a fruitless endeavour. You want there to be an answer. There are so many cases of two individual songs in isolation where one is objectively more popular without dispute, so a definitive answer must exist. All you can really do in the end though is pick a particular metric to measure. Whether it's sales, radio airplay, a well-sampled poll, you'll probably find something that feels right in that way, but wrong in another. To take sales as an example, you wind up with Elton John's "Candle In The Wind 1997" single usually. Makes sense contextually, but it's not a satisfying answer. Not a lot of people continue to rave about that record, it's hardly Elton's signature song, and realistically, isn't even his signature version of that particular song. If you're looking for something more agreeable, that ticks a wider variety of boxes, and actually feels like a satisfying answer to that question, "Blinding Lights" is not a bad option.
You're probably aware of this one. Released in late 2019, sounded like a hit, and when the Christmas season got out of the way, it very much lived up to that, decimating the charts everywhere as almost undoubtedly the biggest hit of 2020. For about half a century, the biggest hit song of all time on the Billboard Hot 100 was Chubby Checker's version of "The Twist". It had two runs at being the hottest dance craze of the time which allowed for it to unthinkably become a #1 smash hit in two separate runs. Billboard weights its all-time lists with respect to different eras' standards, so while "The Twist" may have only spent 39 weeks on the Hot 100, it was so ahead of the pack that every record breaking smash hit in the '90s/'00s/'10s just could not compete. This was until "Blinding Lights" became the song to unseat it. Surprisingly it only spent 4 weeks at #1 on the Hot 100, due to an utterly tumultuous period for the chart where anyone and everyone was making a joke of the top spot with sales gimmicks taking over for what probably should have been months upon months of domination for The Weeknd. A better way to visualise the domination though is to say that previously the record for weeks in the top 5 was 27, tied by The Chainsmokers' "Closer" and Ed Sheeran's "Shape Of You". "Blinding Lights managed 43 weeks. Australia did manage to let it run rampant for 11 weeks at the top. Smash hits either side of it from Tones And I and Glass Animals (both will appear on this list eventually) slightly overshadow it, but it's a fairly strong innings. Oh and it's also comfortably the most streamed song of all time on Spotify, that's got to give it some credit in the 'This is the song that is liked by the most people' stakes. Its 500 million play lead only extends every single day, so for the time being, it's not going to change any time soon.
The song is fine. Can you tell I find it more interesting talking about chart achievements than about this song in particular? I've always preferred "Heartless", the song he put out a couple of days before this one. More Metro Boomin & Illangelo team ups in my Weeknd discography please. Love the video too, just oozes with chaotic fun. "Blinding Lights" is a more standard procedure kind of fun. Max Martin ticking the boxes of carefully planned fun that just don't stand out quite as much as his earlier masterpieces as pop music has come to better form itself around his standard. Not to mention, a-ha already created the most iconic synth riff of all time, anything else that comes for the crown in such an obvious way as this does, is gonna be viewed relatively unfavourably. With a few exceptions, I'm surprised more people don't see The Weeknd as an extremely generic pop star. So many of his biggest hits are songs that anyone could have made. His Hottest 100 catalogue is extremely frustrating as a result.