#480. Holy Holy - How You Been (#100, 2021)
49th of 2021
You might not have noticed because it's been separated by half a week, but I'm going back to back with the last two #100 entries in the list. That's something that visually sticks out just in my spreadsheet but not anywhere else. Then again, you probably come here often, you probably know how this thing works. You know what though? It's been months, so it's time for another graph! It's been so long that I've had to awkwardly teach myself how to do it again, and it was a tedious experience of dodgy charts, and self-referential formulae because I didn't think through my '$' markings. So here you go, the result of 1530 tests on the question of 'How many adjacent double ups should I expect in a randomly ordered list?' This was my beautiful result, and I can tell you that I so far have had 8 double ups myself.
There's another sort of doubling up that I'm interested in here, which is the exclusive list of artists that have managed to land at #100 twice. Officially, it's happened once, with The Cat Empire in 2003 and 2005. On a technicality it's happened three times. Birds of Tokyo share a member with another band, and I'll be talking about both of these songs in the future, and spanning a much wider net, Oscar Dawson managed to do it twice, as a member of Dukes of Windsor and Holy Holy. There are some near misses along with this too, Everything Everything managed #100 and #102. An American rock band of some note got #97, #98 and #100. My favourite is that in addition to The Cat Empire, Harry from the band also got to #101 as a member of Jackson Jackson with "All Alone". This is all something that's incredibly difficult to statistically predict and analyse, so I won't try, but if we count these technicalities, it just has to be shooting over expected value (to say nothing of how many double talk band names I just mentioned). I do suspect in the other two cases, there was probably some voter crossover, but I wonder just how many people voted for both "It's A War" and "How You Been". Did they even know what they were concocting?
For me, I think of "How You Been" as the immediate reality check, and the biggest sign for how much the voting patterns changed in such a short time. I'd go through the voting list and try to pick out the songs I felt were likely to make it into the final list, and when I got to this one, it felt like a no-brainer. It just sounded like a hit, and was the most popular song by a band who were starting to rack up entries. On some level I was still right, but I didn't expect it to only barely get over the line, and actually get beaten by another single (#516). Maybe that's just the way of the voting working like it should for this, a pleasant but not outstanding song. On the other hand, that was a frequent feeling I had for Holy Holy, so I'm not sure how this one dropped the ball. Maybe they were just at the end of their imperial phase and it didn't matter what they put out.
"How You Been" is a good one though. It won't sound massively surprising, but it's a reminder that the cogs are all still working. Something I think they do very well is building so subtly that you don't notice how far you've come. There's a bit of DNA from The Temper Trap's "Sweet Disposition" in this I guess. All those long, drawn out vocal lines when the music is at its most intense.
#479. alt-J - Every Other Freckle (#14, 2014)
50th of 2014
I relish these moments. Often times in an album campaign you can see signposts for what is supposed to be the hit song. It's the one that gets the big announcement, it's the one that likely gets the push on US radio, and it's just the one that feels the most conventional. This can get the public leaning that way as well, but it isn't always immediate. That instinctive feeling of 'I like this one more' can potentially get a head start. I don't think there's any argument to be made that this is a more popular song than "Left Hand Free" (#936), but for that fleeting moment in 2014, things weren't set in place. This peculiar 3rd single was the highest polling alt-J song in 2014, and their best finish ever outside of the song "Breezeblocks" in 2012.
I don't remember being surprised when this happened at the time, it just was the more popular song at the time. Unpacking how or why that was the case can't really be done, but it felt right. If anything, at the time this was the conventional single, only by the terms that we'd gotten used to alt-J's schtick, and this song leans into it pretty heavily. Quirky if occasionally disturbing lyrics, big overbearing bass, and quirky vocal overdubs. It's an alt-J song, alright.
It's probably also just the best mission statement for the album. The start of it is a distant siren call that feels ominous, and it's the kind of sound that's all over "This Is All Yours". Only difference is that this one leans into the poppiness a bit more clearly, vocal runs & drum snaps very reminiscent of the "Breezeblocks" success that made them so big in the first place. They're allowed to get weird again in the middle of the song with a vocal equivalent of a flute solo, which sounds like it should be soundtracking a medieval period piece.
For me, I've always been drawn in by the title lyric strangely enough. It's not a sentence I'd ever imagine a need for, but the monotonous delivery of multiple disyllabic words in a row just works as an effective rhythm. Come on, say it to the tune of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles theme with me!
#478. Queens of the Stone Age - The Way You Used to Do (#87, 2017)
45th of 2017
Though it doesn't always feel like it, the music industry moves very quickly. What might get grouped up in hindsight as a decade of certain sounds & ideas is usually a wildly varying expanse that starts and ends in very different places. Maybe it's self-fulfilling, but you can listen to something and pinpoint a release year not just on remembering it specifically, but because you know in your heart the era that it fits in. You can look back at any decade in music and find that a hit from a year ending in 3 just wouldn't work in the following year ending in 6, or vice versa.
What we've seen in the last decade or so is a hyper acceleration of career trajectories. There's a strong correlation between being one of the most popular artists around and also never taking an extensive break. You don't want to end up out of sight, out of mind for too long or everyone will realise that they can get through just fine without you.
I look at the charts of today and it's constantly reinforcing this. Taylor Swift & Drake are likely to figure somewhere, while the most successful newcomers are the ones that feel like they're on a carefully curated path to never go too long without something to buzz about. For the artists who do take a few years between albums, it feels less reliable. The Weeknd still gets hits but they tend to feel like flukes rather than the expectation. Dua Lipa & Lewis Capaldi stock fell off dramatically after they took a couple of years off. Even one of the biggest stars of the 21st Century, Justin Bieber, is doing well with his new material, but it's all concentrated on a small handful of songs so the cracks are showing. His last album stayed in the top 20 for over a year, whereas the follow up is down to #20 in its 5th week, and that's with new chart rules helping it up. A lot of current day streaming is being driven by people who haven't been doing it for long enough to remember those big Justin Bieber album roll outs, so it's just not part of their vocabulary.
I liken this to my own experience with getting back into music in the mid-2000s. For a couple of years, I'd see new albums from artists that weren't new to most people, but were new to me, and so I'd have to try and latch onto these artists without that context. I thought Interpol were decent, but I hadn't heard a note of "Turn On The Bright Lights" so I wasn't going to be as enamoured about them. Queens of the Stone Age might just be lucky that I happened to tune into them with the song "Sick, Sick, Sick", so there was a lot of good will and I didn't even need to know about "Songs For The Deaf".
When I last wrote about Queens of the Stone Age, it was regarding their 2013 album "...Like Clockwork", a mid-career revival that was uncharacteristically successful, which is why it's also the album I'll have to bring up a couple more times. It's not something that's easy to sustain though, and while Queens of the Stone Age remained successful, time has been catching up, and their tendency to only release a new album every 4-5 years means they no longer feel like part of the conversation. What we've got here is the last burst to fluke another appearance, and I've rarely felt surer that it'd be the last time an artist would appear.
When it comes to "The Way We Used to Do", it occupies an interesting space for me as a single made for crossover that isn't really catering to the fanbase. I find it curious because this kind of thing often does work, and I think that if Queens of the Stone Age released a more conventional hard rock or stoner rock single as the lead, it probably wouldn't have polled at all. This is a band that had been around for over 20 years successfully managing to appeal to the kids.
This was definitely a deliberate decision at the time. The noteworthy attribute of their 7th album "Villains" is that they hired a super-producer to go behind the helm this time around. That producer is someone I can't name yet, but the big hint is to say that he's the main person behind what was probably the biggest hit song released between those two 2010s QOTSA albums. It's hard to fully appreciate what he's doing on this album because it doesn't sound much like his usual affair, but the album we've got is considerably more groove driven than I'm used to. Even the more brooding songs on the album like "The Evil Has Landed" have shades of this lighter sound. Nothing stands out more than this one though.
I wouldn't call this a complete departure for the band (though they did have a new drummer for this album, Jon Theodore). The pace and rhythm of this song recall the band's biggest hit "No One Knows", it just swaps out the menace for a bit more fun. It's something that took a bit of growing for me to get on board with. It's difficult to get used to a band and what they offer on an irregular basis, only to get something else that you feel like you could have gotten elsewhere. I felt better served with other tracks on the album but this was still pretty fun.
#477. Violent Soho - No Shade (#73, 2016)
51st of 2016
Something I like about the big 2016 haul for Violent Soho is the way that you can gradually scan up the list and see closer semblances of mass appeal for them. Most of the time you can clearly see the gap between the 1-3 big hitters, and then the leftovers of intrigue that aren't necessarily unpopular, but they're riding on the wave. It's one of the most tangible ways that a countdown can feel like it's upping the ante as it goes along. We're just building to the Violent Soho main events.
Sometimes I have trouble understanding lyrics, I'll look it up and realise that the real ones make a lot more sense than the jumble of words I put together as if I were lip-reading by ear. After all, why would Violent Soho start talking about 'pearly gates'...wait actually those are the real lyrics. Apparently they can say what they want and I don't have a problem hearing it.
Out of all of Violent Soho's entries, this is the only one that doesn't say either its title, or some close enough variation on it. I guess the word 'no' shows up a few times but I don't find that as easy to call to mind as the other examples that'll continue to show. It just means that every time I do click play on this song, I don't fully remember what I'm about to get into, and I get a pleasant surprise as it starts to click into place. I'd never vote for it, but I'm glad it can file into the creamy middles of choice cuts.
#476. The Rubens - Masterpiece (#38, 2021)
48th of 2021
I do sometimes suspect that getting that one hit song that's bigger than anyone could have planned for can have the negative effect of putting a band's whole career in its shadow. Maybe to you, Little Red is a one hit wonder for their song "Rock It", but I found them to be inescapable years before that song even came out, and their debut album from 2008 is filled with potential hits from a band still finding their footing. It's another way time manages to sand over the edges and simplify everything.
It feels possible that this is a fate that awaits The Rubens as well. They've had 9 Hottest 100 entries, a span of hits covering as many years as Silverchair or Powderfinger. Certainly, they've done more than most could dream of. They're also the "Hoops" (#895) band, their dealings with Lucy got them a Hottest 100 victory, but at what cost?
There probably wasn't a cost really. In the back of my mind, I think of the years that followed that victory, and how it seemed they were cursed afterwards. Barely surviving off loose hits here and there, but then also not even necessarily capitalising on those. They were still polling in these lists, but there's a period from 2019 to 2023 when they were having just rotten luck. In that space of time, they just barely missed the list 3 times, landing at #105 in 2019, #105 again in 2020, and #104 in 2023. That first miss is especially noteworthy as it's their song "Live In Life". Thanks to a very aggressive streaming push at the time, this song spent 23 weeks in the ARIA top 50, a longer tenure than "Hoops", which got two cracks at it. It's comfortably their second biggest hit, and the only reason it probably didn't make the Hottest 100 is because all of that success happened in 2020 after the die was already cast.
When it looked like they were without a paddle, "Masterpiece" came along and polled quite comfortably. They reverted back to missing the poll again after that, but with that in mind, I find their polling in 2024 to be the most impressive part of it. Australian artists are struggling to land on the list at all, but here comes The Rubens to hang out again as if nothing ever happened.
"Masterpiece" made the most sense to me at the time because it felt like a noticeable step up from what they'd been doing for a while. I'm not sure how many other naysayers it may have managed to sway, but for me this is one that clicked instantly. Maybe I'm just susceptible to suggestion. "Masterpiece", it's a masterpiece. Perfect, awesome, right? The chorus just flows really nicely. Good steady rhythm to imply some tension, it pairs well with the idea of being 'on the ruunnnnnnnn'. It's as far as I'm taking them here, but that's only because "My Gun" missed the timing cut off. No misfires over the years could ever get me mad at that one.











.jpg)










%20-%20Single.jpg)



