#170. Flight Facilities (feat Emma Louise) - Two Bodies (#39, 2014)
20th of 2014
There's one more amusing twist in the tale of Taylor Swift in the year 2014. I can only wish that I had the foresight to record in detail all of the more particularly interesting Instagram posts I saw at the time. At the very least, if I was able to catch someone who was voting in protest of the Taylor Swift movement, and unwittingly included Flight Facilities' song "Two Bodies" while doing so. I'm just sure it happened, on the laws of averages and sheer volume. We just can't always catch the irony and contradiction in the various views we find ourselves holding and expressing. Just too much to keep track of at once.
"Two Bodies" is on the lengthier side of things but it's a little bit fabricated. The first 75 seconds of the song features an excerpt of an interview with Rod Serling. He's talking about a comment that TV producer Herbert Brodkin had made at his expense three years ago (or in his funny, old time way of saying it, 'I remember the quote, I didn't understand it at the time. I failed to achieve any degree of understanding in the ensuing years, which are three in number'). The quote is a notion that to strive for commercial success runs counterproductive to being a discerning artist. Herb believed that Rod Serling could not possibly entertain the masses while creating something worthy of praise. He breaks that notion down with his own belief that it's just wrong, and that as long as you, the writer, believe in the integrity of your own work, without feeling shame, then it's absolutely possible to achieve both facets of appraisal. Rod is saying all of this in the lead up to the release of his new television series "The Twilight Zone", which in hindsight is probably the unspoken whammy behind the whole quote. You'd be hard pressed to find many other shows that absolutely succeeded on both of those fronts in the present, and have gone on and stood the test of time for so many decades afterwards. Ariana Grande just had a hit in 2025 named after the show. It's timeless whether you've watched it or not. I think it goes without saying that whether you like it or not, that frivolous pop song that people were trolling the vote with in 2014 will probably continue to be very popular for many decades to come.
I always thought this was just a peculiar thing to lead into the new Flight Facilities single and album, given that this was effectively the lead single to the campaign once it got going. I don't want to accuse them of insecurity as if this was the way to sneak reveal that the album was going to be much more of a pop pivot than people might have been expecting and that it's okay. That's mainly because I don't get that vibe from the album "Down To Earth" at all, but more on that when I get to one of the other songs on it that I have less to say on, try to guess which one! It feels to me more like a frustration that I've grown to understand as I've gotten older and more beyond that line of thinking. It can be so bothersome to just have views parroting those like Herb's in this day and age. When there's something that's undeniably popular, and you think it's very good, but you find a crowd of people who turn their nose up at it. Flight Facilities are big in the game of making remixes, even anthologies spanning the history of popular music, so I'm sure they've encountered people who just can't believe they'd choose to put "Hypnotize" in their mix instead of a deeper cut from Biggie. They're obviously a duo who operate within the boundaries of both ideas though, pop enough to make the triple j countdowns, not pop enough for top 40. When your biggest hit is a nearly 8 minute slow burner that absolutely wasn't made to be a hit, it probably gives you a fresh perspective on the whole situation.
Emma Louise probably has some angle on this as well. Both of her entries on this list have been with Flight Facilities and she only has one other entry otherwise. It's her big breakout single "Jungle" in 2011 that landed her at #23. It was a big commercial success despite how low key it all was. I remember it managing to reach Gold sales back before streaming was introduced which isn't easy to do. It'd later get a whole new audience around the world when it was remixed by Wankelmut and re-released under the name "My Head Is a Jungle". That remix also got its own remix via MK that turned into a smash hit. On the surface, I might be a little put off by that but I found myself enjoying it as a contrast to the original. Okay, maybe the piano is a little too loud, but it's a fun arrangement. Surprisingly it never really got a proper push in Australia. It feels like radio catnip nowadays, any excuse to cheat the quota. My Emma Louise knowledge doesn't go much beyond this. I just have to give a shout out to her single "Boy" which I think is fantastic. She really utilises those drawn out notes, plays with a counter melody behind it and it accomplishes something equally chill and intense, like the best Air songs.
Emma Louise's voice is obviously the key asset though. She always sounded so far beyond her years and brought an incredible amount of gravitas to everything. That still carries through in "Two Bodies". Compared to "Arty Boy" (#760), she's much more in her element. It's all those vocal runs she brings to the table that can't really be emulated. I'd know, whenever Flight Facilities do a live show and they bring in their usual touring vocalist (I'm sure her name is here somewhere), "Two Bodies" is the one song where it doesn't feel quite as natural. Just a song she makes her own. I guess I should give credit to Flight Facilities as well. The whole thing is just composed of incredibly inoffensive but vibrant beats. It's all just very warm and inviting.
#169. Skegss - Got on My Skateboard (#39, 2017)
21st of 2017
Look, I understand the trepidation when it comes to an artist getting a big haul of songs on the list that you're not invested it. I feel it more than most because I collect all the songs, and it literally becomes a forced investment. For some, it's just 20-30 odd minutes of tedium that prevents them from hoisting bragging rights in their favour, and maybe something to be bothered about whenever they're reminded. For me, it's a spectre that haunts my shuffle playlist actively over the next 12 months, and then passively forever after. If someone gets 5 songs on the list, I'm probably hearing them almost every week for that next year.
My first instinct is to be annoyed. My second instinct is to go against that. Every time I see a discussion thread that boils down to 'Spacey Jane are boring, all their songs sound the same', to me, it screams of lacking effort. In the same way a LLM doesn't know what it's talking about, the more that gets said, the more it reveals the same thing. It's just the easy mental trap to land on. I've said time and time again that your earliest impression tends to be the worst one. Even with this, I can't imagine how often I'll still listen to something once or twice, deem it one of the worst things I've ever heard, certain that I'll never budge on that. Much like how I can certify the benefits of practice even when it doesn't feel like it, forcing myself onto these songs can unearth a better perception. It's why I tend to have better views about a lot of Gracie Abrams songs than if I were asked 18 months ago (that and she just has the most annoying detractors going around).
The 2025 Hottest 100 limited the maximum potential of a bunch of artists so there are no massive hauls this time around, just a large batch of moderately sized ones. You've got a whole new batch of Spacey Jane songs (although this time I'm more familiar with them in advance), Ocean Alley, Tame Impala, all the classics. Royel Otis is the one that raises the most eyebrows and I'd readily skip over them if I could. I'm gonna persist with them though. You want to trust the process, both a belief that there's something to be seen in it which is where the votes come from, and that I'll be able to find that something, as I have so many times before. Maybe it's already happening. You won't find charitable opinions about Royel Otis going around much at the moment, but I do think that they've got a knack for emulating very specific sounds of indie rock in the 21st century that I tend to be interested in. This is just a three paragraph pre-amble to say that I think "car" sounds like "Got on My Skateboard".
This is a good kind of homage even though I doubt it's actually intentional. It's probably the best part of both songs, just that steady rolling energy that the guitar provides. I haven't road tested Skegss for various skateboard related video games, but I suspect it's a fitting backdrop. When the verses are going on, I'm barely paying attention to what's being said (though it's hard even if you do try), because the momentum is just doing a downhill jam. It's the ideal iteration for a Skegss song.
#168. Remi Wolf - Photo ID (#75, 2020)
8th of 2020
Way back at the end of 2014, I was deliberating over what should be my favourite song of the year. The toss-up was between a song that will eventually appear on this list (though I'd ironically later realise it came out in 2013), and the song "Warning" by Cymbals Eat Guitars. If you do click on that link and you've never heard of them before, that is absolutely not them in the video. That was a chance discovery of mine that really bore fruit if you ignore the band breaking up not long after. I've generally found myself enjoying a lot of their long, moody songs with dramatic stakes, but "Warning" feels like more of a tilt at alt rock crossover appeal. A really nice riff and a chorus that goes unbelievably hard. When I couldn't really make up my mind, I went against "Warning" and my rationalisation was that it peaked too soon and trailed off without a proper climax. I guess they just never wanted to make typical song structures. Anyway, it's all moot because now I actually think my favourite song of 2014 is "Trustful Hands" by The Dø. You can make up your own mind as to whether it's just that they play more by the rules on that one or they just give out additional treats via playing the chorus in different ways.
This whole ordeal has ironically become the most memorable thing about "Photo ID" for me. I think it gains an added layer because the song has gotten so popular in spite of it. Obviously in the age of streaming, you only need to hook people for 30 seconds and then it doesn't matter what happens, but I just can't think of any song that breaks the rules to the extent this song does. It wouldn't be ungenerous to say that the song gets through its core sequences in about two and a half minutes, leaving another two minutes to just waffle around and you absolutely feel it. This isn't just a popular artist getting away with it, this is Remi Wolf's only entry, and I feel comfortable saying it's her most popular song, though that's with the boost of a Dominic Fike version.
Even without that long outro though, it's still an interesting song. It doesn't really sound like anything else going on, and then you have Remi Wolf herself delivering multiple different tones. She goes from shrill to playful, running alongside, but occasionally also in contrast to the music. I greatly admire her higher register, which just cuts through everything and stands out. Just glad to see that weird, quirky music occasionally still breaks through, or maybe I just like songs with bridges about stepping on people's toes.
#167. The Avalanches - Subways (#91, 2016)
20th of 2016
I'll admit I'm very much someone who just wants to hear the music, but I do get some fun out of quirky promotional campaigns. Just these seemingly unnecessary means to drum up hype for music that we're likely going to check out already, but maybe just that added story can add something to the mystique. Like just recently, Olivia Rodrigo's had people all over the world obsessing over the colour of a wall. Just be silly enough with it that we'll remember.
For The Avalanches, this was a rollout that begged for gravitas. They had spent just about a decade (if not more) in that eternal limbo of whether or not that next album was going to come out. Every year we'd wait for Richard Kingsmill's blog post for new Australian albums to see if The Avalanches rated a mention, only to get disappointed when they did, and nothing surfaced. We all grew restless. It almost seemed like a wait for something that couldn't possibly live up to expectation. The music world had changed so much since "Since I Left You", and I don't think there's the same audience for that same barrel of tricks. Running too close to it would run the risk of the obvious 'Yeah sure, it's fine, but why would I listen to it over the established classic'. I think there are some very good songs on that My Bloody Valentine album that came out in 2013, but that's basically the precedent that was set when The Avalanches were gearing up for this one.
You might think you remember the first song released from The Avalanches second album, and I'll get to it when it has its day, but the first thing we actually heard from the album was "Subways". Why was that? Because about a week before the actual new single came out, there was a hotline number spotted on posters in London, you could call this number and hear a snippet of "Subways". I absolutely got in on this. It was just untoward enough to make the moment feel oddly special, and I gotta say, a new Avalanches album is exactly the thing that deserved this moment.
Since I feel like there are other things to talk about with the last entry, I'll use this opportunity to properly shout them out. The Avalanches are icons. They could've just released the single album and that would've been true, because it was true for a long time. They dipped into that fascinating well of plunderphonics, creating an album entirely out of samples and crafted something utterly beautiful. Every track on the album flows into the next, so it's just this endless journey from the title track of "Since I Left You" (a song I've taken far too long to appreciate) and sending you from hit to hit to hit. Maybe they cheat a little bit with the clear interlude tracks but it's strange how natural it all sounds when many of these components have nothing to do with each other. Then of course they throw the rule book out for the album's other big moment, "Frontier Psychiatrist", where it couldn't be more obvious what they're doing, but they turn it into a dozen odd moments. All the quotability of your favourite idiosyncratic comedy movie (your "Holy Grail", if you would) packed into about 5 minutes. They had me going out of my way to watch the film "Polyester" just to learn how clinically insane Dexter really is (he steps on women's feet) and watch Divine just be beset on all sides as everything goes wrong around them. I missed the moment as a 7-8 year old but I've been obsessed ever since I found out about it. On some level that extra time allowed the legend to cultivate, and it probably paid off well, given what there'll be to say on the next entry.
I think if you love "Since I Left You", you might not entirely get what you're after on "Wildflower", but "Subways" feels like a strong concession to that audience anyway. There's a prominent Graham Bonnet sample and it really sounds like The Avalanches of old (if that makes sense), while the main vocals in the song are from another song called "Subways", by 12 year old singer Chandra Oppenheim. Once again, The Avalanches are resorting to a very familiar sample that's already been used, which is my chance to reveal in case you didn't know, "Sang and Dance" by the Bar-Kays is where that 'na-na-na...' comes from, before Will Smith made it famous on "Gettin' Jiggy Wit It". WhoSampled lists 11 individual samples on "Subways", which is enough to sound like a cluttered mess, but I really think they prove themselves to still be on top of their game here. It all just feels like it belongs together, rather than the mishmash of elements it really is.
#166. E^ST - Life Goes On (#63, 2017)
20th of 2017
I find myself occasionally weary when an artist has a surprise streaming boon that's backed by big playlists. There's a constant mind battle between wondering if the song in question is justifiably the hit, or if you're just witnessing the system being gamed in that very moment. Late 2017 was the time when Kita Alexander had her song "Hotel" generously boosted into 2xPlatinum success despite seemingly little interest for it. Sometimes the first instinct is just to say 'I won't be suckered in by this, I'm better than that'.
I'm not better than that. E^ST had been around for a few years at this point. Generally pretty likeable and serviceable but not making major waves either. Her song "The Alley" stood out to me. It's a pop song with big stakes, self-imposed with intriguing percussion. It's a showcase of E^ST the singer more than anything though. One of the more glaring Australian accents to poke out, but also occasionally flexing her prowess. She also takes the same Psalm quote that Coolio uses in "Gangsta's Paradise", so it's pretty intense all up.
"Life Goes On" is not like this at all. I think I can fathom a turn of events where I feel so betrayed by it that I dismiss it completely. Gone is all that mysterious darkness, instead we enter full on optimistic fun. She's still dealing with a less ideal situation, but not wallowing in it. Maybe you could present the same lyrics and make it sound miserable, but when you put all the focus on 'Life goes on' with these bright, sunny beats, you've just made a summer anthem. Just a very enviable piano riff, that part alone does so much to turn this into a delight. Also happy things have lined up so I'm writing this during E^STER.









%20-%20Single.jpg)








%20-%20Single.jpg)
